Re: Boole

[Daniel L. Weinreb <dlw at MIT-AI>]

I would like to state for the record that either BOOLE should be
strictly limited to three arguments, or it should work as it does in
Maclisp (any number of arguments, left-associative).  It is unacceptable
for it to do anything other than these two things, on the grounds that
adding new arguments incompatibly with Maclisp cannot possibly be so
worthwhile that it is worth introducing the incompatibility.  As to
which of these two things it does, I'll be equally happy with either.