[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
T and NIL
- To: FAHLMAN at CMU-20C
- Subject: T and NIL
- From: Earl A. Killian <EAK at MIT-MC>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1982 23:01:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp at SU-AI
If you're taking a poll, I prefer 2 and then 3 on the NIL issue.
The T issue I can't get too excited about. Whatever is decided
for T, perhaps the implementation that NIL uses should be
encouraged, if it allows experimentation with a separate data type
truth value simply by setting symbols T and *:TRUTH.