global function namespace given too much weight perhaps?

To: "George J. Carrette" <GJC@MIT-MC.ARPA>
Subject: global function namespace given too much weight perhaps?
From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@CMU-CS-C.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 1984 17:12:00 -0000
Cc: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
In-reply-to: Msg of 22 Nov 1984 02:06-EST from George J. Carrette <GJC at MIT-MC>
Sender: FAHLMAN@CMU-CS-C.ARPA

No, FUNCTION is not one of the forms for which SETF is supposed to work.
SYMBOL-FUNCTION is, however.

-- Scott