[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

features

To: Fahlman@CMU-CS-C.ARPA, common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
Subject: features
From: Daniel L. Weinreb <DLW@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 85 18:32 EDT
Fonts: CPTFONT, CPTFONTB, CPTFONTI
In-reply-to: <FAHLMAN.12119198633.BABYL@CMU-CS-C.ARPA>
Reply-to: dlw@SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA

I agree with you and Moon.  Let them be keywords.  The namespace for
packages is already flat; if we are not dealing with conflicting package
names then there is no need to deal with conflicting feature names.  The
language is hairy enough as it is.

Follow-Ups:
- Features
  - From: David C. Plummer in disguise <DCP@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA>

References:
- features
  - From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@CMU-CS-C.ARPA>

Prev by Date: With-Open-File :if-does-not-exist nil
Next by Date: flat name space for pkg names
Previous by thread: features
Next by thread: Features
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread