[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Another omission: global lexicals

To: GJC@MIT-MC.ARPA
Subject: Another omission: global lexicals
From: Daniel L. Weinreb <DLW@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 85 09:48 EST
Cc: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA, RAM@C.CS.CMU.EDU
In-reply-to: <[MIT-MC.ARPA].755061.851215.GJC>

    Date: Sun, 15 Dec 85 18:05:36 EST
    From: "George J. Carrette" <GJC@MIT-MC.ARPA>

    Seriously Dan, if you fellows go before the ISO and say that
	"The oft-discussed:"
    is vague with respect to legality in Common Lisp the USA is going to
    look pretty wimpy.

You're right, George.  I'll never again say that anything is vague with
respect to legality.  Every issue is clear-cut.  We'll see if we can get
Rambo for the technical committee.

References:
- Another omission: global lexicals
  - From: "George J. Carrette" <GJC@MIT-MC.ARPA>

Prev by Date: clarifications
Next by Date: &ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS
Previous by thread: Another omission: global lexicals
Next by thread: Another omission: global lexicals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread