[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Da e: on ay, No mb r 5, 1 8 15:1 : 3
From s huma he @h abs.ar a
Is t eally ce sa y to i lude h @ ( ntire t xt o a pr ious m g o
r fe ence i ? Gu 's l s msg w s a a ticul l egr gi us xample s art ng ut
Date u , 26 N v 8 08:42 ST
Fr m: Ber ard S. Gre nb rg BS SCRC- ONY B OOK. R A
Dat Mon, 5 ov 5 4:0 PST
ro : R ch d Lam n < s @RUS I N SPA. y bol s.COM
Dat : Fri 22 No 85 20: 1: 1 E T
Fr m: Ge rge J. arret " < J @MIT M . RPA>
a d th n epeat n i SECO ime. R al folks ts ot ik we're ll
re di g mail w th a lin itor.
Well, if we're all not using line editors, then having all that text
there shouldn't hurt. The redundant copy was, of course, an error on my
part (sorry). There is also somewhat of a tradition of allowing large
messages to build up occasionally. The likelihood of this happening is
inversely correlated with the seriousness of the subject matter.
Please note that, to save space, I have excerpted and condensed your
original message above.