[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CHECK-ARG-TYPE [and CHECK-SUBSEQUENCE]
- To: JonL at PARC-MAXC
- Subject: Re: CHECK-ARG-TYPE [and CHECK-SUBSEQUENCE]
- From: MOON at SCRC-TENEX
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1982 20:43:00 -0000
- Cc: Common-Lisp at SU-AI
I don't care whether CHECK-ARG-TYPE is called that or CHECK-TYPE, as long
as it exists. CHECK-SUBSEQUENCE seems to be a good idea.