[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SET
- To: RMS at MIT-OZ
- Subject: SET
- From: Earl A. Killian <EAK at MIT-MC>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1982 19:18:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp at SU-AI
Alright, reusing the name SET may be a bad idea for backward
compatibility, so the question becomes whether new functions
should have "F" appended to their names. I say no. There is
already the precedent of PUSH/POP which would have to be renamed
to be consistent. It is easier (and more aesthetic I think) to
instead remove the "F" from the new functions, such as EXCHF,
SWAPF, GETF, INCF, etc.