[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SET vs. SETF



    Date: 24 August 1982  16:10-EDT (Tuesday)
    From: FEINBERG at CMU-20C

	    Sorry, I slipped.  Anyway REMF, PUTF and GETF could be flushed
    in favor of allowing lists to be passed to GETPR, PUTPR and REMPR.  
Read your manual more carefully.

									I
    agree with EAK that we should call SETF SET.
This is not acceptable to me, for reasons given in my previous message.