[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SET vs. SETF
- To: FEINBERG at CMU-20C
- Subject: SET vs. SETF
- From: David A. Moon <Moon at SCRC-TENEX at MIT-MC>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1982 16:53:00 -0000
- Cc: Common-Lisp at SU-AI, EAK at MIT-MC, Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
- In-reply-to: The message of 24 Aug 82 16:10-EDT from FEINBERG at CMU-20C
Date: 24 August 1982 16:10-EDT (Tuesday)
From: FEINBERG at CMU-20C
Sorry, I slipped. Anyway REMF, PUTF and GETF could be flushed
in favor of allowing lists to be passed to GETPR, PUTPR and REMPR.
Read your manual more carefully.
I
agree with EAK that we should call SETF SET.
This is not acceptable to me, for reasons given in my previous message.