[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SET vs. SETF
- To: FEINBERG at CMU-20C
- Subject: SET vs. SETF
- From: David A. Moon <Moon at SCRC-TENEX at MIT-MC>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1982 16:53:00 -0000
- Cc: Common-Lisp at SU-AI, EAK at MIT-MC, Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
- In-reply-to: The message of 24 Aug 82 16:10-EDT from FEINBERG at CMU-20C
Date: 24 August 1982 16:10-EDT (Tuesday)
From: FEINBERG at CMU-20C
Sorry, I slipped. Anyway REMF, PUTF and GETF could be flushed
in favor of allowing lists to be passed to GETPR, PUTPR and REMPR.
Read your manual more carefully.
agree with EAK that we should call SETF SET.
This is not acceptable to me, for reasons given in my previous message.