Re: Predicates for all type specifier symbols

[NGALL@G.BBN.COM]

    Date: 31 Mar 86 12:10:03 PST (Monday)
    From: Daniels.PA@Xerox.COM
    To: NGALL@G.BBN.COM
    Subject: Re: Predicates for all type specifier symbols
    In-Reply-To: <[G.BBN.COM]28-Mar-86 11:20:13.NGALL>
    Message-ID: <860331-121028-4949@Xerox>
    
	    "Also, If we had TP and NILP we would have the TRUE and FALSE functions
    that KMP was asking for!"
    
    Not quite: TRUE and FALSE take an arbitrary number of arguments and ignore them all.
    
Oops! You're right.  I should have said "we would have the TRUE and FALSE
functions that are sufficient for reducing the 'visual clutter' mentioned
in KMP's error proposal!"

	-- Nick