[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Proposal #7A - Type-Specifier-P

It seems to me that the proposed function Type-Specifier-P
is in fact Type-Name-P, since it cannot be called with an
arbitrary CL type specifier.  Perhaps its name should be
changed accordingly.

Personally, I would prefer to have (Typep foo 'Type-Specifier) -
but then again I'd like all types to be represented by objects
of type Type too.