[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Inconsistencies in Sequence Function Arguments

To: common-lisp@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU, sears%wrs.DEC@decwrl.DEC.COM
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in Sequence Function Arguments
From: sears%wrs.DEC@decwrl.DEC.COM
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1987 13:48:00 -0000

I agree that REDUCE should take a :KEY keyword.  There seems to be
little difficulty in implementing it, I have found it frequently
useful, and it provides consistency with the other sequence functions.  The
change is upward compatible with the existing language.

/wrs

Prev by Date: Re: Redefinition of CL Functions
Next by Date: Inconsistent keywords for sequence functions
Previous by thread: Re: Redefinition of CL Functions
Next by thread: Format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread