[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Interpretation Needed for #+feature
On some systems (LMI Lambda, KCL) the form below is NOT read (or, at least,
I get no complaint):
#+symbolics (local-symbolics-package:name a b c)
On Golden Common Lisp, however, the reader balks because it cannot resolve
local-symbolics-package:name since the package does not exist.
Naturally, I prefer the first behavior for writing code to be moved to
many different machines. What is the correct interpretation?
-Ed Krall
Parallel Processing Program
Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation
3500 West Balcones Center Drive
Austin, Texas 78759
(512) 338-3406
ARPA: krall@mcc.com
UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!im4u!milano!mcc-pp!krall