[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Interpretation Needed for #+feature

On some systems (LMI Lambda, KCL) the form below is NOT read (or, at least,
	I get no complaint):

#+symbolics (local-symbolics-package:name a b c)

On Golden Common Lisp, however, the reader balks because it cannot resolve
	local-symbolics-package:name since the package does not exist.

Naturally, I prefer the first behavior for writing code to be moved to
	many different machines.  What is the correct interpretation?

-Ed Krall
Parallel Processing Program
Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation
3500 West Balcones Center Drive
Austin, Texas  78759
(512) 338-3406
ARPA: krall@mcc.com
UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!im4u!milano!mcc-pp!krall