[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- To: Common-Lisp@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- From: "Robert W. Kerns" <RWK@AI.AI.MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 88 04:58:03 EDT
- In-reply-to: Msg of Thu 22 Sep 88 14:50:59 PDT from jrose at Sun.COM (John Rose)
- In-reply-to: Msg of Fri 23 Sep 88 00:22:57 EDT from Communications Satellite <COMSAT at AI.AI.MIT.EDU>
[Delayed because of a Babyl bug...]
The other way to generalize hash tables to allow for sets is in terms
of the number of values stored. If you Symbolics has a :NUMBER-OF-VALUES
argument, which can be 0 or 1. (It could be more, but this is made awkward
by the order of arguments to PUTHASH).