[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Fahlman @ CMU-CS-C
- Subject: Another ballot
- From: Alan Bawden <ALAN @ MIT-MC>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 1983 18:53:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp @ SU-AI
5. Yes. It should be zero-based as Moon points out.
6. As the implementor of defstruct, let me point out that it makes no
difference which way this vote goes. Even if you don't write these
functions into the Common Lisp spec, I am likely to write a portable
defstruct that requires you to have them anyway.
7. Flush FSET, but keep SET. I type "(SET + ...)" to the read-eval-print
loop all the time. FSET I never use, it has a poor name, and it
isn't even a traditional function.
9. Don't care.
15. I would suggest 5 as the largest array rank required to be supported.
17. Yes. I suggested this last December along with some other suggestions
about Gaussian rationals. (I suggested that the functins GCD,
NUMERATOR, and DENOMINATOR have their domains appropriately inlarged,
for example.) Does this indicate that my other suggestions were lost