[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DEFCONSTANT and EQ
- To: Scott E. Fahlman <Fahlman at CMU-CS-C>
- Subject: DEFCONSTANT and EQ
- From: MOON at SCRC-TENEX
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 1983 20:45:00 -0000
- Cc: Alan Bawden <ALAN at MIT-MC>, Common-Lisp at SU-AI
- In-reply-to: The message of Sun 12 Jun 1983 16:15 EDT from Scott E. Fahlman <Fahlman@CMU-CS-C>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 1983 16:15 EDT
From: Scott E. Fahlman <Fahlman@CMU-CS-C>
All I am saying is that the description of EQ
should contain a note that because of possible stack-allocation and
other optimizations, implementations should not depend on (EQ X X) if
the value of X is any kind of number, character object, or byte
specifier, even though this might work most of the time in most
implementations. They can depend on EQL.
EQL doesn't work on byte specifiers in your implementation, if I remember correctly.