[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MVlet
- To: RPG at SU-AI
- Subject: Re: MVlet
- From: Fahlman at CMU-20C
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1982 00:39:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp at SU-AI
- In-reply-to: Your message of 30-Jan-82 1651-EST
But why chose a form that is hard to implement well and that will
therefore be implemented poorly over one that is easy to implement well?
If we are going to CONS, we may as well throw the MV stuff out
altogether. Even if implementation weere not a problem, I would prefer
the simple syntax. Does anyone else out there share RPG's view that
the alleged uniformity of the hairy syntax justifies the hair?
-- Scott
-------