[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Things to do

To: HIC%SCRC-TENEX@MIT-MC.ARPA
Subject: Re: Things to do
From: Charles Hedrick <HEDRICK@RUTGERS.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 1983 04:43:00 -0000
Cc: Fahlman@CMU-CS-C.ARPA, common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
In-reply-to: Message from "Howard I. Cannon <HIC at SCRC-TENEX>" of 17 Aug 83 00:36:25 EDT

An alternative might be
  movei n,2
  pushj p,@[fadr block]
where the address in the fadr block was indexed by N.  That would still
save testing and dispatching within the function itself, but would
avoid adding 4 words to the FADR block.  What do you think?
-------

Prev by Date: Things to do
Next by Date: Re: Things to do
Previous by thread: Things to do
Next by thread: Re: Things to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread