[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FORMAT

To: berman@vaxa.isi.edu
Subject: Re: More FORMAT
From: Don Morrison <dfm@JASPER.PALLADIAN.COM>
Date: Wed, 20 May 87 01:01 EDT
Cc: Moon@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com, common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: <8705192222.AA05902@vaxa.isi.edu>
Reply-to: Don Morrison <DFM%JASPER@LIVE-OAK.LCS.MIT.EDU>

    Date: Tue, 19 May 87 15:22:17 PDT
    From: Richard Berman <berman@vaxa.isi.edu>

    I hope there is a way to have guaranteed non-adjustable arrays!

Why?  Is there any thing that non-adjustable arrays are good for the adjustable
arrays are not?  I thought it was just that you paid a performance hit for
adjustability in some (typically non-special-microcode) implementations.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More FORMAT
  - From: Richard Berman <berman@vaxa.isi.edu>

References:
- Re: More FORMAT
  - From: Richard Berman <berman@vaxa.isi.edu>

Prev by Date: adjustable arrays
Next by Date: All arrays can be adjustable?
Previous by thread: Re: More FORMAT
Next by thread: Re: More FORMAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread