[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
TRUE, FALSE
    Why not just a function CONSTFN that takes a value and returns a function
    that will return that value?
So far only two such functions have been asked for, one of which
produces a null value and the other of which produces something
non-null: T, for lack of any better thing.  Do we really need a 
general function to build such things?  I don't think so.
Down with generality, and down with the generals!
-- Scott
- Follow-Ups:
- TRUE, FALSE
- From: David C. Plummer <DCP@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA>
 
- TRUE, FALSE
- From: David C. Plummer <DCP@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA>
 
- TRUE, FALSE
- From: Guy Steele <gls@THINK-AQUINAS.ARPA>