Re: Where Pure Common Lisp lives

[Steven Haflich <smh@mit-ems.ARPA>]

> From @SU-AI.ARPA:snyder%hplsny@hplabs.ARPA Fri May 23 11:58:17 1986
> 
> Here's an alternative: How about leaving LISP:MAKE-PACKAGE alone, and
> defining LOCAL:MAKE-PACKAGE to default to the LOCAL package?

You'll have to do the same for LISP:IN-PACKAGE, and you'll have to fix
the compiler to give LOCAL:IN-PACKAGE the same special attention it
gives LISP:IN-PACKAGE...  It's disturbing how rapidly any hacking of
the package system gets ugly.